Americans Against Guardianship Abuse Corruption in the Courts, Elder Abuse, Guardians extortion of Wards and their families and more by Sam Sugar, MD.

"Some hard realities we must now disclose.

As we watch victims from every corner of America plead for our help day after day; as we watch  judges make a mockery of justice in probate courts around the country; as lives and fortunes are demolished on the altar of voracious greed; as we witness the rapidly accelerating erosion of trust in our bedrock institutions of law we cannot help but come to some alarming conclusions.

Now, we must stand and state for all to realize that:

1. Juryless probate guardianship proceedings are illegal, but are being masqueraded by the wealth extractors as constitutional due process, in order to steal the assets of innocent American citizens in contravention of law.

2. Essentially all state probate court guardianship proceedings are being carried out illegally and without jurisdiction.

3. The having knowledge of this wrongdoing, and failing to take appropriate action is a crime in and of itself.

4. All knowledge of such wrongdoing and suspected wrongdoing are the jurisdiction of the local grand jury panels of the applicable district/state/territory. American citizens have the absolute right and obligation to report these wrongdoings directly to these grand jury panels, as well as to any governmental agency. Any obstruction of these types of lawfully mandated reports are a Federal & State offense, Obstruction of justice, jury witness & evidence tampering.

The startling truth is that for decades innocent older Americans have been raped and pillaged under color of Law by an out of control segment of the elite court insider class who have abused the sacred but misplaced immunity they enjoy.

They have perverted our laws and bent them to their greedy and criminal will. They have betrayed their oath, their profession and their country.

They have committed heinous crimes and even resorted to torture to suppress exposure of their sadistic behavior.

Unless we rise up as one to combat this legalised cult of predation none of us is safe.

More to come."

A typical civil court procedure: "You are free to leave this court once you give us all your money in the form of unnecessary & unwanted legal fees, that I, as judge, will ensure you are charged. You WILL pay these legal fees.".

Source and Full Judicial Corruption / Guardianship Article
http://aaapg.net/some-hard-realities-we-must-now-disclose/

PETITION FOR REMOVAL OF ELIZABETH SAVITT AS GUARDIAN FOR FRANCES BERKOWITZ

"IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND
FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
Case No. 502014GA000630XXXXNB
Division: IJ
IN RE: GUARDIANSHIP OF
FRANCES BERKOWITZ
_________________________________/
AMENDED PETITION FOR REMOVAL OF ELIZABETH SAVITT
AS GUARDIAN FOR FRANCES BERKOWITZ
Petitioners, WILLIAM WEBSTER MILLSAPS and DONNA GREENSPAN
SOLOMON, pursuant to section 744.474, Florida Statutes, and Florida Probate Rule 5.660,
hereby petition the Court for the removal of ELIZABETH SAVITT as the guardian of the person
and property of FRANCES BERKOWITZ, and in support thereof state as follows:


MATERIAL FACTS

10. In 2013 and 2014, Millsaps and Solomon represented the Berkowitzes in
connection with a wide-ranging fraud that had depleted the Berkowitzes of their entire life
savings of over $1.2 million. During the course of heavily-contested litigation, Millsaps and
Solomon recovered over $835 thousand from the fraudster for the benefit of their clients and,
additionally, were able to “freeze” several hundred thousand dollars more of Mrs. Berkowitz’s
funds, which Millsaps and Solomon located in Amtrust bank.

11. In late 2014, Millsaps and Solomon became concerned that Mrs. Berkowitz was
declining and perhaps suffering from diminished capacity and/or the undue influence of her
caregivers. It appeared that significant additional recoveries were being put at risk. As a result,
on December 3, 2014, Millsaps petitioned for a determination of capacity of Mrs. Berkowitz and
the appointment of a professional guardian on an emergency basis for Mrs. Berkowitz, in order
to protect Mrs. Berkowitz from possible and then suspected exploitation by her caregivers.

12. The court docket shows that the guardianship proceeding was initially assigned to
Savitt’s husband, Judge Martin H. Colin (“Judge Colin”).

13. Judge Colin did not enter any orders in the proceeding. Instead, on December 4,
2014, a different judge granted Millsaps’ petition for emergency guardianship and appointed
Savitt as the emergency temporary guardian of Mrs. Berkowitz. On January 7, 2015, Savitt was
appointed as the limited guardian (“Guardian”) of Mrs. Berkowitz.

14. Notably, the Petition for Emergency Guardianship revealed on its face that Mrs.
Berkowitz had substantial assets. This is significant because it appears that allegedly
incapacitated persons (“AIPs”) with significant assets initially assigned to Judge Colin have been
transferred to other divisions where Savitt is then appointed as guardian, all without an audit trail
as to the purpose for the transfer in divisions and appointment of Savitt.

15. Savitt was not a family member or friend of Mrs. Berkowitz, whom she had never
met before. Savitt was appointed as a “professional guardian.” The Statewide Public Guardian
Office requires such professional guardians to undergo credit and criminal history checks before
being appointed.

16. Despite the requirement for credit and criminal history checks before
appointment, Savitt and her husband had just had a final judgment of foreclosure entered against
them. On November 17, 2014 -- less than a month before the guardianship appointment---the
final judgment of foreclosure was rendered, showing a balance due of $308,328.04. A
foreclosure sale was scheduled for March 17, 2015.

17. On December 8, 2014, while still only Mrs. Berkowitz’s temporary guardian,
Savitt filed an emergency motion to compel Mrs. Berkowitz’s bank to provide her with access to
Mrs. Berkowitz’s financial records and to distribute all of her funds to Savitt. The emergency
motion was granted that same day. Also on December 8, 2014, Savitt went to Mrs. Berkowitz’s
bank to “open accounts.”

18. However, on December 26, 2014, Savitt told Millsaps that Mrs. Berkowitz had
“no money left” in her accounts, despite Millsaps’ advising Savitt that Mrs. Berkowitz should
have had close to half a million dollars remaining.

19. On March 11, 2015, the bank in Savitt’s foreclosure action filed a motion to
cancel the pending sale scheduled for March 17, 2015, vacate the judgment and dismiss the
action, stating: “The parties have reached settlement whereby the indebtedness of Ms. Savitt to
[the bank] has been satisfied.” (emphasis supplied). On March 28, 2015, the bank executed a
release of the mortgage of Savitt’s property.

20. Meanwhile, on January 26, 2015, Dean Rosenbach (“Rosenbach”) and the Law
Offices of Marshall E. Rosenbach substituted in as counsel for the Guardian (Savitt) and Mrs.
Berkowitz in the Underlying Actions. Rosenbach is a personal friend of Savitt’s husband, Judge
Colin.

21. Serious concerns have been raised about Savitt’s conduct as guardian, including
those raised in The Palm Beach Post’s investigative reporting series entitled “Guardianships: A
Broken Trust.” A portion of that series is annexed hereto as “Exhibit A.”

22. In the wake of The Palm Beach Post’s investigation, all of Savitt’s guardianship
cases have been moved to the north county courthouse and Judge Colin was transferred out of
the probate division.

COUNT I – REMOVAL OF SAVITT AS GUARDIAN
23. Petitioners adopt by reference, as if set out fully and completely in this Count, the
following statements of this Third-Party Complaint: Paragraphs 1 through 23.
24. Savitt should never have been appointed temporary emergency guardian and then
limited guardian of Mrs. Berkowitz. Her appointment was obtained improperly and/or through
fraud.

WHEREFORE, Petitioners hereby request that the Court remove and replace Savitt as the
guardian of Mrs. Berkowitz, and order an accounting and transfer of property as required by
Florida Probate Rule 5.660.

Source and Full Court Filing and Exhibits
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3005319/Amended-Petition-for-Removal-of-Savitt-as-Guardian.pdf

More at
http://judgemartincolin.blogspot.com/

Family Court Injustice and Corruption: Daddy Justice Film Trailer by Ben Vonderheide

"Criminal Court Judge Richard Baumgartner unbelievably occasionally purchased the drugs from people he had sentenced to prison. "

"A Knoxville Criminal Court judge was so addicted to pain drugs during his last several years serving on the bench that he was having sex and buying prescription drugs on the street during courtroom breaks.

As we discussed herepreviously, Criminal Court Judge Richard Baumgartner unbelievably occasionally purchased the drugs from people he had sentenced to prison.

 Despite the nature of his acts while in office, most people around him did not know that Judge Baumgartner had a problem until months after he stepped down from the bench in March 2011 for a single count of official misconduct. As new allegations continue to surface about his behavior, others question whether he was sober enough to have effectively performed his job.

The high profile Christian/Newsom case was thrown out by a special judge who ordered new trials after revelations of Baumgartner’s illegal acts while on the bench. Many other defendants are lining up for a similar attempt to get their convictions overturned.

The requests for new trials could overwhelm the Knox County justice system, as Baumgartner had a prolific caseload, being one of three judges in the county who heard felony criminal cases.

“We’re getting pleadings almost daily now from people in the penitentiary filing habeas corpus saying, ‘Let me out too.’ It’s raining over here,” said Knox County District Attorney General Randy Nichols."

Source and Full Article
http://foxxmediagroup.com/2012/04/13/ky-judge-having-sex-and-buying-prescription-drugs-on-the-street-during-courtroom-breaks-us-courtrooms-full-of-judges-who-abuse-power/

So Funny, Marc Randazza and David Aman Claims I Exorted them but they both made me offers I REFUSED.

Marc Randazza offered to buy Marc Randazza.com long ago, though Kashmir Hill of Forbes has the story all wrong, and has not even seen the entire email communication between Blogger Crystal Cox and Marc Randazza nor does she know of the content of the Marc Randazza Crystal Cox phone call.

Anyway, Marc Randazza offered for the Domain Name, then he demanded, both I refused. Then Marc Randazza, to teach me a lesson, called the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to offer Testimony, a Deposition, to set me up for Extortion though I never Extorted Him. This because he was upset over me buying the Domain Name, which is certainly NOT illegal.

AFTER Marc Randazza Joined Forces with the "Bad Guys", the Plaintiff, and I, being my own attorney was given notice of Marc Randazza's Deposition to set me up, then I got upset and AFTER this, I bought several more dotcoms to prove a point, and noticing that Marc Randazza 's wife and daughter's dotcom was available, what better way to make the point of how bad he is at this "Domainer" thing, and how he is NOT the Internet Expert he Claims to Be.

See even after Marc Randazza threatened me for own his dot com and even though he defened  Isaac Eiland-Hall in the buying, owning and using the domain name
"www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" , still he did not buy the dot com of his beloved, WHAT?


Marc Randazza emailed me and told me I have no right to own a domain name that resembles his name. Talk about Double Standards. Was it extortion for the Glen Beck name to be purchased and used attacking Glen Back and accusing him of rape and murder? This Domain Name "implies"that a Young Girl is a "Minor" right? And it accuses a man of a Rape and Murder. This is Ok in the Eyes of Attorney Marc Randazza, but for some reason me Owning MarcRandazza.com is not, nor Owning JenniferRandazza.com and his childs name, which I bought AFTER he joined the plaintiff to PROVE and to prove Point, and I never Published that Information he did that. Popehat.com Kenneth White and Marc Randazza did that with her photo, as did Forbes Kashmir Hill. NOT ME.

Even after the threat to me for buying MarcRandazza.com, he still was to dumb to buy the dotcom of his own wife and child. I wanted to point out that he was a Fraud in his representation to Potential Clients, as I had interviewed Marc Randazza to possibly represent me, and he was so Disrespectful that I chose a better choice for me and for the Entire Blogger V. Journalist, Free Speech, First Amendment Rights Debate. I did not initiate connect with Marc Randazza, nor Him to me, we agreed to talk through the recommendation of another person, one of my Investigative Bloggers, whom was also on the call.

I never "Begged" Marc Randazza to be my Attorney, in FACT I never even asked. I simply took the call in order to feel out my options, and get more information on what I thought to be Experts in the First Amendment Bar.  I had already been contacted by the Attorney I did choose and was weighing my options. And trying to learn all I could for best of for all who do what I do, so I could make the right decision on the next step for the Greater Good.

Marc Randazza, almost lost me the Attorney I wanted, because Marc Randazza told the Attorney that he represented me. This was after my Attorney had heard through others of the First Amendment Bar that Marc Randazza was representing me.

Those believing I begged him to be my Attorney are Flat Wrong, think about it, why would I do that when I already had what I deem to be the most respected First Amendment Expert. A Legal Scholar who treated me with respect and focused on the Merits of the Case and nothing petty what so ever. I chose a man who is Respectful of my Rights and Talks kind to me, treats me with dignity even if he disagrees he is respectful about it and presents a very Intelligent, Sensible reason why he may disagree.

I had already spoke to this man, and read his incredible resume (Click Here to Read).

And yes I took a call to see what Marc Randazza Had to say, to offer, and out of respect for my Investigative Blogger whom contacted him. And I took the call to explore my options, thing is we did not speak again and next thing I knew, he was telling others he represented me and I had already agreed to work with the Attorney I chose. I had to contact Marc Randazza to tell him he did not represent me and why, I will be posting that email in Full coming soon. No one sentence pulled out as Kash-Shmear Hill likes to do, instead of investigate the entire TRUTH and Real FACTS.

Keep in mind this Plaintiff that Marc Randazza decided to align with was the same Plaintiff he was negotiating with in December of 2011, on my behalf and WITHOUT MY PERMISSION. Conflicts of Interest, Talking Behind the Potential Clients Back, Giving Away my Strategy, and completely disrespecting me and violating my right.

So Marc Randazza offered to buy the Domain Name, then Marc Randazza emailed and said you made your point what do you want and now he is Roaring that I extorted HIM, that is simply not true and is a Smoke Screen to cover up what he actually did to me.

Now Cut to David Aman, the Original Accuser of Extortion, and the One whom gave Forbes the infamous, false light defamatory email AFTER he had already won his case against me. See the Media Frenzy saying I am Guilty Until Never Given the Chance to be Proven Innocent, well they all got their Story from David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney for the Plaintiff.  Yet David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney in his Frenzy to set me up for Extortion is still making me offers to Settle.

Yesterday, April 2nd 2012 David Aman, made and Offer to My Attorney to Settle. Why do this ? See David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney really wants to set me up for Extortion, he recently Deposed me and it was all about setting me up and previous income instead a real asset probe which would be about future income.

Last Week David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney threatened to file another Motion to Compel with Judge Hernandez to threaten and Harass me some more, this week an offer to Settle. It is all so convoluted.

Posted Here by
Crazy Crystal Cox
aKa - the Unhinged Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Crystal Cox Marc Randazza WAR

The two sides of Burnsides

If you live in Ravalli County Montana, you may have seen several opinion pieces by Judge Chee Burnsides of Darby Montana.  He is proudly talking about what he believes is the Constitution.  How Judge Chee Burnsides actually conducts his life is far from the edicts in the US Constitution.

Hypocrites usually try to shine a better light on themselves....as do criminals.

Judge Chee Burnsides was a Williams, AZ police officer in 2006 and killed a person in custody named Jensen.  Look up the Arizona Daily Sun, they did an article on this situation involving Chee Burnsides.  Without knowing the details other than a man named Jensen was in handcuffs and in Officer Chee Burnsides custody in 2006.  In the "sally port" of the police station, Jensen was reportedly striking Chee Burnsides (but dead men don't talk).

Ravalli County Sheriff Department was more than happy to accept Chee Burnsides onto their force.  As Chee Burnsides had family in the Los Alamos, NM area, he attempted to be certified there, and I believe did not make the cut, and resigned.  Ravalli County Deputy, and a Coconino Co. Sheriff Department gave Chee Burnsides a recomendation.

Chee Burnsides attempting to be a Los Alamos, NM police officer.



As a judge, Chee either lets his poor judgment get the best of him, or simply does not care for the law, as he did in Williams, AZ in 2006.  What kind of judge sentences a person to jail for 3 days as no law was broken?  That would be Chee Burnsides of Darby City Court in Montana.  Judge Chee Burnsides is pretending to be an independent judge as he worked in the Ravalli County Sheriff Department less than 10 years ago.

If you listen carefully in his court, he asks the clerk what to do, and her opinion on bail, and procedure.  Chee Burnsides writes columns in the "Ravalli Republic" about the Constitution and absolutely disregards due process, and accused rights.  In Williams, AZ Chee Burnsides was judge jury and executioner.  In Ravalli County Chee Burnsides is living a double life.

This blog network is dedicated to exposing the truth.  It must be painful to have taken a life in your custody, it must be really painful to attempt to be "constitutional" and yank the rights from those in front of, or in vicinity of Chee Burnsides.

This posting on Chee Burnsides is to alert Ravalli County residents, voters, and others of the dangers of Chee Burnsides.  He should not be able to progress to a Justice Court JP in Ravalli County.  If Chee Burnsides runs for this office in Ravalli County, please alert good people to the truth, and double life of this abusive law enforcement officer, and Judge.

Knowledge is power.  Don't trust Judge Chee Burnsides.

Marc Randazza has his Panties in a Wad and has started a WAR with Blogger Crystal Cox. Crystal Cox Vs. Mark Randazza.

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.